This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Due to strict FDA guidelines, pharma marketers also need to monitor conversations for adverse events, off-label discussions, and misinformation. What sets pharma apart is the need for analytics platforms that are HIPAA-compliant and can integrate medical lexicons and terminology into sentiment analysis.
Much of the data used in AI models—like browsing behavior, health-related searches, or CRM entries—can be considered sensitive under regulations like HIPAA, GDPR, or CCPA. Regulatory agencies like the FDA, FTC, and EMA are watching closely to ensure that AI-driven tactics do not violate consumer privacy or promote off-label uses.
The emergence of HIPAA-compliant targeting technologies, HCP-specific segments, and improved analytics has made social platforms not just viable but essential for pharmaceutical marketing. While off-label promotion is still strictly regulated, unbranded awareness campaigns have found creative footing. It’s a strategic pillar.
Leverage first-party data to refine retargeting strategies while maintaining HIPAA compliance. FDA and HIPAA Compliance in PPC Fair balance requirements Ads must include benefits and risks equally. No unapproved drug claims All claims must be backed by clinical research and FDA-approved labeling.
For starters, every email must comply with HIPAA, CAN-SPAM, and FDA regulations. Missteps in off-label promotion or data security can trigger legal and reputational risks. While email remains a powerful tool for engaging healthcare professionals and patients, it’s subject to unique constraints.
HIPAA regulations, FDA guidelines, and state-level data privacy laws require careful consideration. Ad creatives must be approved by legal and medical review teams to meet FDA labeling requirements. Yes, when executed with anonymized data and reviewed creative, RTB can meet HIPAA and FDA guidelines.
As automation becomes smarter, ensuring HIPAA and GDPR compliance remains critical. Leveraging tools that enable real-time content approval and centralized tracking can prevent outdated messaging or off-label promotion. However, marketers must balance innovation with privacy.
For those tackling these issues, digital advertising partners like eHealthcare Solutions offer targeted, HIPAA-compliant tools to reach verified HCPs and patients safely. Furthermore, branded drugs must now navigate digital labeling, AI-assisted prescribing tools, and cross-border telehealth platforms.
Challenges in Pharma Email Marketing Pharma brands face unique barriers that other industries dont , such as: Strict compliance regulations (FDA, GDPR, HIPAA) that limit messaging. Drug names and indications must align with FDA-approved labeling. Email fatigue among HCPs and patients , leading to low open rates.
Compliance and Best Practices Adhere to Regulations: Pharma marketers must ensure that their programmatic campaigns comply with regulations such as HIPAA and FDA guidelines. This includes safeguarding patient data and avoiding off-label promotion. How can pharma marketers ensure compliance in programmatic campaigns?
Robotic dispensing systems help prepare prescriptions by packaging and labeling medications to improve efficiency. If pharmacists are utilizing AI programs, they have to ensure they comply with federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations. Liability is also a concern if your pharmacy is using AI.
Compliance to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). If you want patients to refill prescriptions and/or contact you, your pharmacy website needs to comply with HIPAA to secure your sensitive patient data. Create a label for your folders and directories inside your pharmacy website according to the purpose. .
Compliance to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). If you want patients to refill prescriptions and/or contact you, your pharmacy website needs to comply with HIPAA to secure your sensitive patient data. Create a label for your folders and directories inside your pharmacy website according to the purpose. .
Given the public health emergency, health authorities offered greater flexibilities in the use of digital health platforms and technologies such as: Enhanced HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) flexibilities in the use of telemedicine services 3. Journal of the American Medical Association 327, no. 2022.2040.
There are important considerations if the DHTT is classified as a medical device, which may change the level of regulatory controls and evidentiary requirements to support its appropriate use, such as off-label versus on-label use of a device with prior marketing authorization.
Were not trying to bury the lead here, but the battle of labeling these surgical and drug treatments is a political one. And the memo goes one step more arguing that, even if otherwise truthful, promotion of off-label uses of hormones can run afoul of FDA prohibitions on misbranding and mislabeling. See United States v. Facteau , 89 F.4th
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content