Remove Documentation Remove Labelling Remove White Paper
article thumbnail

Sino Biopharma spends $951m to acquire China-based LaNova Medicines

Pharmaceutical Technology

The net payment made by Sino to acquire LaNova will be approximately $500.9m, a figure that excludes the estimated cash and bank deposits, according to a company document outlining the terms of the transaction. At the time, Sino spent 142 million yuan ($19.80m) to initiate its ownership involvement with the biotech.

article thumbnail

From data to impact: How real-world evidence will transform healthcare

pharmaphorum

Skip to main content Monday 7 July 2025 BlueSky linkedin youtube rss User account menu Subscribe Channels Channels Digital Market Access Oncology Patients R&D Sales & Marketing Spotlight on Content type Content type Digital -News -Views & Analysis -Deep Dive -Webinars -Podcasts -Video -White Papers -Event Market Access -News -Views & (..)

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Exforge antitrust settlement caps Novartis’ year of legal disputes

Pharmaceutical Technology

According to the legal documents , the plaintiffs accused the companies of “violating federal antitrust laws, alleging “per se” and “rule of reason” violations”. Novartis argued that the early release of Entresto generics could cause labelling inconsistencies.

article thumbnail

The Incredible Shrinking Exemption: FDA Final CDS Guidance Would Significantly Narrow the Scope of Exempt Clinical Decision Support Software Under the Cures Act

The FDA Law Blog

Javitt — On September 28, 2022, the FDA issued the long anticipated final Clinical Decision Support Software Guidance (CDS Guidance), which replaces the revised draft guidance document from 2019. The final guidance focuses on labeling as a means to effectuate Criterion 4. software or labeling.

FDA 52
article thumbnail

Pharma 4.0™ Is Gaining Momentum and Driving Innovation

ISPE

™” is becoming an increasingly rhetorical one, particularly in view of the growing momentum in the pharmaceutical industry and in various statements and white papers from key regulatory agencies. Is the vendors’ documentation complete in order to assess GxP risks and GxP compliance? The upcoming Pharma 4.0™

article thumbnail

A Proposal for a Comprehensive Quality Overall Summary

ISPE

Concept Paper: M4Q(R2) Common Technical Document on Quality Guideline.” Ultimately, the summary was not adopted during the QbD pilot, but was reintroduced in 2014 when a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) team prepared a white paper describing the content and format of an improved Module 2.

article thumbnail

A Proposal for a Comprehensive Quality Overall Summary

ISPE

Concept Paper: M4Q(R2) Common Technical Document on Quality Guideline.” Ultimately, the summary was not adopted during the QbD pilot, but was reintroduced in 2014 when a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) team prepared a white paper describing the content and format of an improved Module 2.