Skip to Main Content

And so, another working week will soon draw to a close. Not a moment too soon, yes? This is, you may recall, our treasured signal to daydream about weekend plans. Our agenda calls for manicuring the Pharmalot campus, hanging with our shortest short person, indulging in still more ancient rituals and, otherwise, simply lounging about. And what about you? This is a fine time to sift through apple orchards and pumpkin patches. You could stock up on winter gear before prices rise still more. Perhaps you could double-check to ensure you are registered to vote. The U.S. is still a democracy, after all. Or you could make time to reach out to someone special and make them feel important. Well, whatever you do, have a grand time. But be safe. Enjoy, and see you soon. …

The drug-pricing law will still penalize pharmaceutical companies if they hike prices on medicines for patients who have private insurance, STAT says. The penalties may factor into decisions for pricing medicines as the new law begins to take effect. Some experts and employers have been concerned that the drug-pricing policy reforms that will save money in Medicare could incentivize drugmakers to try to charge more to patients with other forms of insurance coverage. “One thing that I think is important to know is the inflation rebate is determined on the overall price. So it’s including commercial [prices] in there,” explained Center for Medicare Director Meena Seshamani.

advertisement

In the run-up to an extremely unusual hearing later this month, newly released documents underscore highly contrasting views taken by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and a manufacturer toward a controversial drug for reducing premature births, which the agency wants withdrawn from the market, STAT writes. For the first time, the FDA explained in copious detail why agency officials believe the medication, which is called Makena, should be removed. The briefing documents, released in advance of the three-day session, also pushed back considerably against arguments made by Covis Pharma, the manufacturer, for continuing to make its drug available to American women.

STAT+ Exclusive Story

STAT+

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and networking platform access.

Already have an account? Log in

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly

$39

Totals $468 per year

$39/month Get Started

Totals $468 per year

Starter

$30

for 3 months, then $39/month

$30 for 3 months Get Started

Then $39/month

Annual

$399

Save 15%

$399/year Get Started

Save 15%

11+ Users

Custom

Savings start at 25%!

Request A Quote Request A Quote

Savings start at 25%!

2-10 Users

$300

Annually per user

$300/year Get Started

$300 Annually per user

View All Plans

Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

Subscribe

STAT encourages you to share your voice. We welcome your commentary, criticism, and expertise on our subscriber-only platform, STAT+ Connect

To submit a correction request, please visit our Contact Us page.