Skip to Main Content

And so, another working week will soon draw to a close. Not a moment too soon, yes? This is, you may recall, our treasured signal to daydream about weekend plans. Our agenda is still on the drawing board, but we do plan to catch some outdoor sounds, promenade with the official mascots, manicure the grounds, and hold another listening party, where the rotation will likely include this, this, this, this and this. And what about you? There is much to do this time of year — the great outdoors are beckoning with mountains to climb, lakes to swim, and beaches to stroll. There are also cityscapes to explore if crowds are your thing. Perhaps you prefer to catch up on your reading, instead. Or maybe just plan the rest of your life. Well, whatever you do, have a grand time. But be safe. Enjoy, and see you soon. …

Amgen will no longer develop an early-stage obesity pill, and will instead focus on a more advanced injectable candidate that is seen as a potential competitor to Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy and Eli Lilly’s Zepbound, STAT tells us . The injectable drug, called MariTide, is in a Phase 2 trial for obesity, and chief executive officer Bob Bradway told analysts in an earnings call that “we are very encouraged with the results” from an interim analysis of that trial. Topline data are expected late this year. The company is planning a “broad” Phase 3 program that will study MariTide in obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related conditions,.

advertisement

In a boost for Gilead Sciences, the California Supreme Court agreed to review a contentious legal theory that thousands of HIV patients have used in a closely watched case to argue drugmakers can be held negligent for failing to develop a medicine, STAT reports. Earlier this year, a state appeals court ruled the company could be held liable for halting further development of an HIV medicine that was safer than an HIV drug it was already selling. Back in 2004, Gilead explained its decision by maintaining the medicines were not sufficiently different, but internal documents produced in court suggested the company made this move in order to maximize profits.

STAT+ Exclusive Story

STAT+

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and networking platform access.

Already have an account? Log in

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly

$39

Totals $468 per year

$39/month Get Started

Totals $468 per year

Starter

$30

for 3 months, then $39/month

$30 for 3 months Get Started

Then $39/month

Annual

$399

Save 15%

$399/year Get Started

Save 15%

11+ Users

Custom

Savings start at 25%!

Request A Quote Request A Quote

Savings start at 25%!

2-10 Users

$300

Annually per user

$300/year Get Started

$300 Annually per user

View All Plans

Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

Subscribe

STAT encourages you to share your voice. We welcome your commentary, criticism, and expertise on our subscriber-only platform, STAT+ Connect

To submit a correction request, please visit our Contact Us page.